Photo by Tara Monastesse ’25
Mount Holyoke’s research services team, based in Library, Information and Technology Services, has created a LibGuide to track lost federal data.
By Sydney Wiser ʼ27
Staff Writer
In the months since Donald Trump took office, an unprecedented amount of federal records have been altered or erased from government websites. According to the New York Times, over 8,000 web pages across at least a dozen U.S. government websites have been taken down. These web pages range in subject matter from public health information on preventing chronic diseases from the Center for Disease Control to data tracking hate crimes from the Department of Justice.
To address this wide-scale information purge, Mount Holyoke College’s research services team has created a LibGuide called “Disappearing Federal Data.” The LibGuide is a compilation of “data rescue efforts” made by research and free press organizations, according to its web page.
When federal records began to be scrubbed in January, the College’s Head of Research Services, Irene McGarrity, and the LITS team saw peer institutions create web pages addressing the disappearing information. Despite some initial hesitation, McGarrity decided to make one for the Mount Holyoke community as well.
“If a really good thing already exists, I don't feel the need to remake it,” McGarrity said. “But ultimately, we decided that Mount Holyoke faculty and staff would appreciate just having something specifically for them with Mount Holyoke's name and branding on it.”
As of time of writing, the page provides access to 13 data-preservation sites. These resources include “End of Term Web Archive,” which preserves archived government websites; “Data Rescue Project,” which “rescues” data and data access points for at-risk government data; and the Harvard Law Library Innovation Lab, which houses datasets from data.gov, PubMed, and federal GitHub repositories. McGarrity compiled these sources from other established guides that are tackling the information purge.
The erasure of federal records began after the Trump administration started issuing executive orders on Jan. 20. Of these executive orders, the two that resulted in the most purging of federal information were entitled “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” and “Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing.” These two orders directed government agencies to erase all programs, initiatives, and contracts pertaining to “gender ideology” and “diversity, equity, and inclusion.”
Since the initial purge, some pages have returned as a result of public backlash and lawsuits. NPR reported that a week after being taken down, parts of the CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System – which is responsible for tracking the health of young Americans – have returned to the website.
However, a statement on some pages of the CDC’s website now reads: “Any information on this page promoting gender ideology is extremely inaccurate and disconnected from the immutable biological reality that there are two sexes, male and female. The Trump Administration rejects gender ideology and condemns the harms it causes to children, by promoting their chemical and surgical mutilation, and to women, by depriving them of their dignity, safety, well-being, and opportunities. This page does not reflect biological reality and therefore the Administration and this Department rejects it.”
It is common for incoming presidential administrations to “rebrand” government websites, according to McGarrity. She said that even before the establishment of government websites, administrations have withheld public access to information in other mediums.
However, McGarrity has concerns about what she describes as the “perfect storm” of conditions occurring alongside the purge. “I think the combination of social media, filter bubbles, information silos, political polarization, and information erasure and revision is very, very dangerous. It makes it easier to convince people of things that aren’t true,” McGarrity said.
McGarrity also worries about the targeting of trans and nonbinary individuals. She finds the executive order claiming that there are only two genders “quite disruptive, because we live in a world where that's not true, and people express gender in lots of different ways.”
In addition to these concerns, McGarrity also has fears about the public losing access to a wide variety of unbiased, accessible and federally-funded information which McGarrity described as a “public good.” She noted that research conducted by private entities like corporations can sometimes be inaccessible or misleading.
“The idea is that we as citizens will pay a little bit of money in our taxes to fund this data and have it be available for everybody,” McGarrity said. “Having it available for everybody means that there’s not barriers based around socio-economic status, everybody can access it.”
There are numerous benefits to the public having access to federal records such as datasets. According to McGarrity, this research can broaden people’s worldviews and challenge their perceptions. “It helps us see what our reality is,” she said.
McGarrity also noted that public data can amplify societal problems, pointing to how research about the opioid crisis brought the issue onto the national stage and increased the resources directed toward the crisis.
At the College, McGarrity explained that faculty members use federal records for their research. Students also use this information for projects and to help them understand the world around them.
McGarrity hopes that students and faculty members will build on the work that she has started with the Disappearing Data LibGuide. McGarrity stresses that the page, which is updated weekly, is “constantly evolving,” and encourages individuals who know of other resources to reach out to the research services team at researchservices-g@mtholyoke.edu.
Madeleine Diesl ’28 contributed fact-checking.