Photo by Carmen Mickelson ’24.
Pictured above, the COVID-19 Testing Center, which isn’t currently operating. While students were required to test twice a week during the last school year, they are not required to test at all this year.
By Rebecca Gagnon ’23 & Jesse Hausknecht-Brown ’25
Features Editor | Managing Editor of Layout & Features Editor
Content warning: This article discusses ableism.
Petitions, signatures, demands and fear are just a few of the reactions that arose in the Mount Holyoke community when the announcement of relaxed COVID-19 regulations were heard.
After three semesters of required twice weekly testing for COVID-19 in addition to masking in virtually all public indoor areas, the College has now determined that these regulations and procedures will be removed for the 2022-2023 academic year.
On July 28, 2022, Interim President Beverly Daniel Tatum distributed a newsletter to the community about the new expectations in place for the upcoming semester, under which COVID-19 regulations were loosened. In the newsletter, Tatum wrote, “While we have not yet reached a point where we can officially say that COVID-19 has moved fully from a pandemic stage to an endemic one, strategies are shifting, locally, nationally and internationally, toward policies that help us live with COVID-19 as an ever-present part of our daily lives. To that end, we are aiming to return to pre-pandemic operations as much as possible, with some additional precautions in place for the launch of the semester.”
Under these new guidelines, students were required to have a negative COVID-19 test before arriving on campus. However, weekly testing is no longer required for students throughout the school year. Instead, only those who are symptomatic may receive a test through College Health Services. Employees faced the same expectation of arriving on campus with a negative COVID-19 test, and have been asked to obtain their own tests locally.
“I remember reading [the new guidelines] and being like — we could do better. We can do better. Why aren’t we doing better? Since then, it’s kind of become my goal, my mission, to do better because if the school can’t do it,
I can do it.”
As for masking — contrary to the Spring 2022 semester when students were required to wear masks in any non-dining, indoor public space at all times — mask mandates for this semester tentatively end on September 30, as announced by the College’s Health and Safety Committee on Sept. 14. Another change is that visitors are now welcomed back to the College at any point. All guests are asked to self assess symptoms while overnight guests must be registered and fully vaccinated.
After reading the newsletter, students, faculty, staff, alums and parents of the Mount Holyoke community have expressed concerns about the new guidelines and their ability to keep people safe.
“I was really frustrated about it because I felt like in the past couple of years, … this was kind of a bubble that was safer,” Sophie Coyne ’24 expressed. “That was something that made me feel a lot safer … being on campus and more comfortable, at times relaxing my own [COVID-19] restrictions because I was aware of what the [COVID-19] rates on campus were like, or if the people around me were getting tested.”
For Soli Guzman ’24, the new policy did not meet the needs of vulnerable students in the College community. “I remember being extremely angry because the school is constantly saying that ‘We care about our students, we care about our trans students, we care about our disabled students’ and they pull shit like this,” Guzman stated.
Coyne feels the new policy is potentially dangerous for the health and safety of disabled and immunocompromised members of the Mount Holyoke community. “Also, generally — as somebody who is potentially immunocompromised or at least chronically ill — it’s really scary,” Coyne said. “I know for other chronically ill and disabled students on campus this can be very much a life or death thing. But also … [COVID-19] can disable anyone.”
From these concerns arose an idea to begin a petition demanding that the College return to its previous guidelines to keep the entire community safe. This petition was started by Coyne and Guzman on change.org and circulated to a variety of members of the Mount Holyoke community throughout the summer of 2022.
“I remember reading [the new guidelines] and being like — we could do better. We can do better. Why aren't we doing better?” Guzman said. “Since then, it’s kind of become my goal, my mission, to do better because if the school can’t do it, I can do it.”
Coyne expressed a similar idea as to why they chose to begin the petition. “We were like, ‘If we’re going to email [the College], it will look better if there are more people on that side.’ It also gets the word out to students who, coming into the year, weren’t thinking about how [COVID-19] might be on campus, since there is [such] broad support, at least, for testing. Also for continuing masking if there’s no testing, because people liked the peace of mind of it.”
In the introduction of the petition, Coyne and Guzman call to all students, faculty, and staff to truly think about the guidelines for the upcoming year and if they keep the community safe. The document states, “Previous relaxing of COVID-19 restrictions led to increased cases on campus, particularly toward the end of spring semester 2022, and it is deeply concerning that [COVID-19] precautions that proved effective this past year are not going to be available this upcoming semester.”
To this extent, Coyne and Guzman asked for the reinstatement of mandatory asymptomatic testing twice a week for all students and staff, that mask mandates remain in indoor facilities — especially classrooms — to reduce the risk of the spread of airborne diseases and a call for “a more detailed action plan” on the emergent monkeypox virus.
At the commencement of the Fall 2022 semester the petition had accumulated 346 signatures. In addition, several of those who had signed it were inclined to comment on their reasoning for returning guidelines to their previous state.
“Without required asymptomatic testing it’s impossible for anyone to make informed decisions — also rendering it impossible for the College to make changes if there were (and with conditions as they are, this is very likely) a large-scale break out on campus,” an anonymous Mount Holyoke junior wrote in the comment section of the petition. “No required asymptomatic testing = no information. If no changes are made to the current plan in time for the semester to start, student, faculty and staff safety is going to be actively undermined.”
After returning to campus, the aforementioned student’s worries have only gotten worse. They described feeling like they know COVID-19 is going around campus and are scared that there is no way to know the full extent of the problem without regular testing. “As recently as this week, I’ve spoken to an RA who told me that their residents have come to them, panicking, when their roommate has [COVID-19], not knowing what else to do,” they said. “One student has even gone as far as to sleep in the common room to try and avoid infection.”
Community members, not just those physically on campus currently, are concerned about the College’s new policies. Anneke Craig ’22 added a comment on the petition which read: “I’m a ’22 grad. Last year, MHC’s exceptional COVID policies kept me, my fellow students, and my loved ones — including immunocompromised and health care worker family members — much safer. Without the testing program and masks, my parents and sibling would not have been able to see me graduate. I urge the college to reconsider this decision and restore the testing and masking policies for this year. Protect disabled students, faculty, staff and community members now!”
Another alum, Lauren Fuller ’22, stated, “I signed the petition because I support the Mount Holyoke community, and I believe that everyone in our community deserves to access our spaces with minimal risk. I feel we have an obligation to minimize [the] risk of contracting COVID-19 wherever possible. … Mount Holyoke was the only place I lived in where I had the assurance that everyone in my community was not only masked, but tested frequently. I think it was the only place I've experienced during the pandemic where I was not very worried about contracting it.”
“Also, generally — as somebody who is potentially immunocompromised or at least chronically ill — it’s really scary. I know for other chronically ill and disabled students on campus this can be very much a life or death thing. But also ... [COVID-19] can disable anyone.”
With the signatures and concerns from fellow students, alums, faculty and parents from the petition in mind, Conye and Guzman brought their efforts to the school’s attention in an email sent to Dean of Students Amber Douglas, Health Services, Medical Director Cheryl Flynn, the Office of the Provost and Dean of Faculty and Disability Services.
In this email, Conye and Guzman brought up the three main points in their petition, expanding their reasoning. They remarked on the impacts of relaxing guidelines last year and the effect it had on students, including an uptick in COVID-19 cases. They went on to state that students who catch COVID-19 not only will be unable to make it to class, fall behind and potentially lose academic standing, but they run the risk of passing it on to other students, especially if they are asymptomatic. In addition, both Coyne and Guzman emphasized in their email that this virus, doesn’t just affect disabled students but can cause disabilities as well, citing a Time article which states, “A study posted online in June as a preprint (meaning it had not yet been peer-reviewed) found that reinfection adds ‘non-trivial risks’ of death, hospitalization and post-COVID health conditions, on top of those accumulated from an initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. Organ failure, heart disease, neurologic conditions, diabetes and more have been linked to SARS-CoV-2 infections.”
The anonymous student echoed this sentiment and explained that they feel unsafe as a chronically ill, high risk student. They stressed the fact that all students — including able-bodied ones — are at risk of severe health complications. “Even if one believes that they will not get severely ill if they contract [COVID-19], more and more studies are showing the incredibly dangerous, long term impacts of this disease, even [in] mild cases. … The risk of all of this is known to only increase with each repeated infection.”
Without free testing provided by the College, Coyne and Guzman are concerned about the inaccessibility of COVID-19 tests. Pioneer Valley Transit Authority buses and shuttles are offered at times that may not align with local business hours to obtain testing. In addition, a great number of pharmacies are now prioritizing drive-thru testing, which makes it difficult for students without access to a car to get tested. Coyne and Guzman’s email also reflects on the impact that insurance may have on one’s ability to obtain a test and the effect purchasing a test would have on low-income families.
In their email, Coyne and Guzman also mentioned the effectiveness of masking, drawing attention to a Boston University study published by the American Medical Association that demonstrates the importance of masking in a classroom.
To conclude the communication, Coyne and Guzman reminded the College about the importance of providing accommodations for the students most at risk from COVID-19 and ensuring that all students feel comfortable and safe returning to the campus for another semester.
“As a school that claims to be so progressive, we should be on the forefront of protecting disabled students and protecting students from becoming disabled, potentially,” Coyne stated. “I don’t want to wait until we have a student die of it, because that would be horrific. Luckily, nothing like that has happened yet, but you shouldn’t have to be forced to walk into a classroom where you might catch a deadly illness, and none of your classmates are potentially protected from it either.”
Guzman is passionate about fighting for this issue because they have seen that other students are worried about the new policies as well.
“I think our biggest push was seeing disabled students on Instagram complaining and being like, ‘I don’t feel safe.’ On top of that, seeing people on Twitter being like, ‘This doesn’t feel good for us,’” Guzman stated.
Speaking from personal experience, Guzman went on to point out that it is not possible to know which community members may be impacted by shifts in COVID-19 restrictions. “I’m disabled [and] I don't look it. … I already have an autoimmune disease and for me — as someone who took an entire year online — the most important thing is for me to have a normal college experience. I have worked too hard to get here and not have that.”
Although Coyne stated that they had low expectations for their email to the College, they and Guzman did receive a response from the Health and Safety Committee. In their response, the Committee stated that vaccinations are still “one of the most effective ways to limit spread and severity” of COVID-19 and to that extent, “The College will continue to require all students and employees to receive a primary COVID-19 vaccination series and one booster for the 2022–2023 academic year.” In addition to this, the email also expressed that, since the CDC changed their guidelines to reflect that an asymptomatic person who has not knowingly been exposed to COVID-19 does not need to be tested, the College would not mandate it. However, every student may obtain a test through College Health Services.
In addition, the Committee stated that they plan to monitor Hampshire County’s COVID-19 levels and make determinations based on their statistics. Finally, if any students wish to mask, they may. Immunocompromised students can contact Disability Services to discuss any accommodations that may be made in the classroom or help them through these guideline changes.
After receiving this email, Conye and Guzman responded again to the Health and Safety Committee asking questions for clarification such as, “Does Mount Holyoke intend to increase or create shuttle services to locations providing PCR tests?” to help lower-income students and students without their own transportation on campus; “Will Health Services be providing PCR tests or rapid antigen tests to students with symptoms?” since PCR tests are the ones that are more likely to identify COVID-19 and “We ask: why is Mount Holyoke unable to offer optional, asymptomatic testing for students who may want it? If cost is a barrier, can you give us evidence that all COVID-19 mitigation funding the College received from the government has been used?” In addition to their questions, Coyne and Guzman stated that if testing was no longer an option available this academic year, mandatory masking in classrooms is the most effective alternative proven to keep students, faculty and staff safe.
In the final email sent by the Health and Safety Committee, they once again stated their determination to monitor cases and indicated that Health Services would be available for testing for symptomatic or recently exposed individuals, additionally stating that masking was always welcomed in the community, even if not mandatory.
This response was not satisfactory to Coyne or Guzman.
“They responded,” Guzman stated. “They responded to us like we didn’t read their email and [like] we didn’t read the current [COVID-19] policies. … Their response was basically sending us everything [they had already sent].”
Guzman went on to state that although the Committee cited the CDC and stated that they were going to enforce vaccinations and boosters, the College hasn’t sent out any reminders of those things, which further upset them.
“I think what was frustrating was, it felt as if they didn’t really read our email or consider what we said, particularly in the second email they sent us. It genuinely looked like they hadn’t even read what we’d written,” Coyne expressed.
Members of the College administration could not be reached for comment by Mount Holyoke News.
Although Coyne and Guzman have not responded to the last email the Committee sent, they do not plan to stop here.
“We are now considering what other methods could be potentially [used],” Coyne stated. “Maybe going through SGA or something like that to continue to raise the concern since it’s clear that the email route isn’t really working.”
Both students feel as though student voices are not being heard under the COVID-19 guidelines and wish to keep pursuing the matter. Coyne and Guzman want to stand up not only for their concerns, but also the concerns of parents, alums, faculty and other students who do not feel able to stand up for themselves.
“I want the student body to fight for this,” Guzman finished. “My biggest worry is that we’re just [going to] give up and people are gonna get sick. … We’re saying this because we want to live, and we’re not going to be able to live without caring about other people. It’s just a simple form of humanity, and that’s why I think we need to get [testing and masking] back.”
